How consistent your management is can only ever be gauged over the longer term.That said, the data FM offers have never been particularly reliable. It's fairly obvious why the game doesn't simulate anything like this. In actual football, things tend to be a good deal more severe, as they can last weeks, and months. Bayern won 7-2 at Spurs, and every other shot went in.įour days after that they lost 1-2 to Hoffenheim, where it didn't. Ive just had a game where it finsihed 8-3 to me, yet the game before where I had 50% more shots on targets i drew 0-0, its inconsistant Still 2 goals were scored.Ģ0% is not good, and by 20% i mean 20% of the highlights, not actual shots, thats a lot worse most times. The one on ones are from difficult angles, and almost all the finishes centrally in front of the box are purely from the set piece. To highlight the above, this is an FM match with a) a lot of one on ones (RED), and b) a lot of attempts from the set piece (BLUE). The game naturally allows crap like that. A lot of download tactics are hugely prone to this, as they push literally everybody up, playing completely into the hands of defensive opposition. This stat would be crucial, as a side havinng so much purely from the set piece is the telltale sign of it struggling to break a defense down. Headers under pressure will barely be anything quite near a tap-in, and on top of that are mostly picked up by the keeper. It is a thing the game doesn't have a stats for, which is the attempts from the set piece. Oh, and, whenever I see an FM match with 15 SOT and no goal, I know what to look out for, and it is not the amount of 1vs1. Plus, they are not that common in real football. Misses over a couple weeks or months are perceived differently than over but a couple matches. The most concerning thing is still their frequency. There seem to be ones where the convesion is actually 1 in 2, or 50% or slightly higher This is crucial: ****One on one is not one on one***. In parts this is because the wide players/wingers seem to have it too easy It is fair to assume that they are lesser ones than the average 1 goal in 3 long-term average. Additionally, the forward is still closed down. If you watch, in partly due to bad decisions, the 1vs1s in game are oft/mostly from really tough angles rather than centrally in front of goal. Streaks of not scoring as such should be really really common place, no matter the forward. On average over a variety of them, they are 1 in 3 chances. I'm not sure whether the 1vs1 rate in general is *that* absurdly off.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |